[jitsi-users] Jidesha with preference to point to own jitsi-meet instance


#1

Hi

I wanted to ask if there's a demand for this.
We from Adfinis SyGroup would be happy to provide you with this
functionality but it would be great to hear your opinions about this
before we start off.

I hope this is the right place for this question.

Sincerely
Lukas Häusermann

···

--
Adfinis SyGroup AG
Lukas Häusermann, Lehrling Systemtechniker, GPG
KeyID: 38EE350E

Keltenstrasse 98 | CH-3018 Bern
Tel. +41 31 550 31 11


#2

Hi,

This is definitely the right place to ask :slight_smile:

The extension serves a couple of purposes, one of which is to whitelist the given domain so screen sharing works. Hopefully this will be lifted in the future (it’s no longer required in Firefox 52) but it is a requirement today. How will your changes address this?

Cheers,

···

On Mar 3, 2017, at 09:29, Lukas Häusermann <lukas.haeusermann@adfinis-sygroup.ch> wrote:

Hi

I wanted to ask if there's a demand for this.
We from Adfinis SyGroup would be happy to provide you with this
functionality but it would be great to hear your opinions about this
before we start off.

I hope this is the right place for this question.

--
Saúl


#3

Hi Saul

Hi,

This is definitely the right place to ask :slight_smile:

The extension serves a couple of purposes, one of which is to
whitelist the given domain so screen sharing works. Hopefully this
will be lifted in the future (it's no longer required in Firefox
52) but it is a requirement today. How will your changes address this?

Thanks for your feedback!

Why is a whitelist it no longer required in firefox 52?
If this is the case so does it still make sense for us to improve the
plugin?
We planned to expose a whitelist setting in the gui of firefox and
chrome.

cheers,
luk

···

On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:49:32 +0100 scorretge at atlassian.com (Saúl Ibarra Corretgé) wrote:


#4

Hi!

Hi Saul

Hi,

This is definitely the right place to ask :slight_smile:

The extension serves a couple of purposes, one of which is to
whitelist the given domain so screen sharing works. Hopefully this
will be lifted in the future (it's no longer required in Firefox
52) but it is a requirement today. How will your changes address this?

Thanks for your feedback!

Why is a whitelist it no longer required in firefox 52?

Because Mozilla decided so :slight_smile:

If this is the case so does it still make sense for us to improve the
plugin?

It’s still useful for scheduling meetings in Google Calendar or Outlook, but not for screen sharing purposes.

We planned to expose a whitelist setting in the gui of firefox and
chrome.

This won’t be needed on Firefox. In Chrome, AFAIK, the whitelisting happens at installation time, it can’t be done after the fact.

Cheers,

···

On Mar 9, 2017, at 17:42, Lukas Häusermann <lukas.haeusermann@adfinis-sygroup.ch> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:49:32 +0100 > scorretge at atlassian.com (Saúl Ibarra Corretgé) wrote:

--
Saúl