ya working on my repo
1 Like
Why are you changing port 9090 to other port ?
that what make it working lol
each JVB need it own jetty_port. as they are in the same kubernetes cluster and websocket is routing to the jvb connected.
colibri (JVB) websockets
location ~ ^/colibri-ws/([a-zA-Z0-9-\.\:]+)/(.*) {
proxy_pass http://$1/colibri-ws/$1/$2$is_args$args;
proxy_http_version 1.1;
proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
proxy_set_header Connection "upgrade";
tcp_nodelay on;
}
2 Likes
@congthang You can use metacontroller for dynamically generating service.yaml for jvb’s instead of creating one by one for all the jvb’s.
1 Like
Would be nice if you can contribute to repo
1 Like
Hi @congthang , Can you please tell what are the resolution and bitrates used for this benchmark testing? If you can provide the configuration (from config.js I believe) that will help. Thanks
Its from mvn test I think it very low