As previously discussed (see
please consider renaming the main jitsi binary from run.exe to
something more obvious like jitsi.exe and providing a digital
signature, so that when security software like SEP asks the user what
to do, it's easier to understand what's happening.
This is the relevant part of the discussion from
to set the scene:
">Symantec Endpoint Security (SEP)'s Network Threat Protection module
throws up a warning when Jitsi attempts to communicate with the
world. Renaming the binary from run.exe to jitsi.exe (or something similar) would help users understand what's going on.
This has been on our todo list for a while. We just haven't got around
to it yet. Could you please open a ticket?"