I see that COIN is in an experimental track and MUJI obviously has
-Understand that JITSI implements COIN. Is there any jabber server out there
that implements either COIN or only the "media mixer for jingle clients:
nothing fancy just the bare bone singalling and media(rtp)"? The aim is to
support audio conferencing in jabber chat rooms using jitsi.
-Though unlikely, may be IETF should get some inspiration from the XMPP
spec.authoring guidelines. COIN write up is far more welcoming to the reader
than any other RFC I have ever read.
-Are there any other alternatives to COIN under consideration.
-I see that COIN tries to stay close to the RFC 4575 as far as possible.What
other standard track RFC are there that are worth a go through in context of
I would appreciate any input on this.
p.s: posted to the two lists assuming the relevance to be as such..don't
know if most people are member of both lists. point noted and my apologies
if that was of inconveniene to anyone.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Emil Ivov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Please try not to abuse the mailing lists. Only post to one mailing list
at a time and only once per subject. Please remember that there are
hundreds of subscribers on these lists and unnecessary noise quickly
На 09.07.11 07:13, Adnan написа:
> I am exploring support for setting up remote voice conference bridge
> along with chat rooms - all in one place.
> Now, from an implementation perspective which XEP explains voice + IM in
> a chat room.
Here's one: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0272.html
> Does jitsi support it?
No, Jitsi does conf calls with http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0298.html
> Also, as in XEP-0045 Multi User Chat, is my interpretation correct that
> it only referes to chat rooms with text i.e. no voice conference
This is correct.
Hope this helps,
> This is becasue I find the use of term "voice" e.g. "granting
> voice" in following, a bit confusing as after reading the spec it seems
> to mean "texting rights". So there is no such thing as voice conference
> support in the chat room when it comes to XEP-0045.