Service still works ok, but I'm thinking if I have something bad on
configuration. I thought it's because my hosting ddos-protection, that
strips udp packets, and moved on other one, but I still see these in logs.
We should probably make Jitsi Meet stop sending local candidates to the
bridge. They would at best be redundant and most of the time would just
fail so ...
We should probably make Jitsi Meet stop sending local candidates to the
bridge. They would at best be redundant and most of the time would just
fail so ...
It is normal to see some of these, but not too many (I don't think more than one per pair is normal). I think there is some kind of problem in videobridge (possibly fixed in the latest version), as I'm observing many of these (thousands) logged for one and the same pair.
Boris
···
On 15/10/14 22:36, Michael Zalmoxisus wrote:
Is it ok to have ice4j connectivity processTimeout?
Service still works ok, but I'm thinking if I have something bad on
configuration. I thought it's because my hosting ddos-protection, that
strips udp packets, and moved on other one, but I still see these in logs.