[jitsi-dev] ITP: TurnServer - ICE/STUN/TURN server implementation from TurnServer.org


#1

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au>

Upstream:

  http://www.turnserver.org

  The Jitsi development group is CC'd on this ITP bug because they are
the upstream contact for TurnServer.org

Tarball:

  http://turnserver.sourceforge.net/index.php?n=Main.Download

Similar packages:

  Debian already has the reTurn server in the package
resiprocate-turn-server (from the source package resiprocate):
  http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/resiprocate-turn-server

  TurnServer.org provides a completely different implementation in C,
with a slightly different feature set

  Both reTurn and TurnServer are high quality projects and having them
both in Debian is worthwhile as it gives users more choice if one
doesn't meet their needs


#2

By way of explanation, every new package in Debian must start with an
ITP (Intent-To-Package) bug, hence the bug report below

The bug is now registered:

  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684481

and supporting details can be submitted to 684481@bugs.debian.org if
necessary

···

On 10/08/12 11:49, Daniel Pocock wrote:

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au>

Upstream:

  http://www.turnserver.org

  The Jitsi development group is CC'd on this ITP bug because they are
the upstream contact for TurnServer.org

Tarball:

  http://turnserver.sourceforge.net/index.php?n=Main.Download

Similar packages:

  Debian already has the reTurn server in the package
resiprocate-turn-server (from the source package resiprocate):
  http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/resiprocate-turn-server

  TurnServer.org provides a completely different implementation in C,
with a slightly different feature set

  Both reTurn and TurnServer are high quality projects and having them
both in Debian is worthwhile as it gives users more choice if one
doesn't meet their needs