[jitsi-dev] Failed to set the VP8 TL0PICIDX


#1

Hi all!

I am observing many of these messages flooding the JVB log into an
ongoing conference:

···

---------------------------------------------------------------------
JVB 2017-05-18 16:03:59.853 WARNING: [88761]
org.jitsi.videobridge.cc.SimulcastController.log() Failed to set the VP8
TL0PICIDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Any idea what the cause might be?

I am using the versions of the Jitsi Meet packages available in the
testing repository.

Thanks in advance.

Kind regards,
Daniel


#2

Hi Daniel, which JVB version are you running? This should appear too often with the latest.

···

On May 18, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> wrote:

Hi all!

I am observing many of these messages flooding the JVB log into an
ongoing conference:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
JVB 2017-05-18 16:03:59.853 WARNING: [88761]
org.jitsi.videobridge.cc.SimulcastController.log() Failed to set the VP8
TL0PICIDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Any idea what the cause might be?

I am using the versions of the Jitsi Meet packages available in the
testing repository.

Thanks in advance.

Kind regards,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@jitsi.org
Unsubscribe instructions and other list options:
http://lists.jitsi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


#3

Hi, George.

Thanks for your reply.

This is the version I am using:

root@Jitsi:~# aptitude show jitsi-videobridge | grep Version
Version: 942-1

Kind regards,
Daniel

···

On 18/05/17 12:16, George Politis wrote:

Hi Daniel, which JVB version are you running? This should appear too often with the latest.


#4

Hi Daniel,

I believe that version is affected by the problem, so if you update the problem should go away. I encourage you to update more frequently since you’re in the unstable branch because we find and fix bugs and issues pretty often there.

I hope this helps.

George

···

On May 18, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> wrote:

On 18/05/17 12:16, George Politis wrote:

Hi Daniel, which JVB version are you running? This should appear too often with the latest.

Hi, George.

Thanks for your reply.

This is the version I am using:

root@Jitsi:~# aptitude show jitsi-videobridge | grep Version
Version: 942-1

Kind regards,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@jitsi.org
Unsubscribe instructions and other list options:
http://lists.jitsi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


#5

Hi Daniel,

Hi, George

Thanks for your reply.

I believe that version is affected by the problem, so if you update the
problem should go away. I encourage you to update more frequently
since you’re in the unstable branch because we find and fix bugs and
issues pretty often there.

I hope this helps.

I'm now using the "testing" repository instead of "unstable". I see that
version 950-1 is available in "testing". Do you think it would be solved
in this version?

Thanks for your time.

Kind regards,
Daniel

···

On 18/05/17 12:27, George Politis wrote:


#6

Hi,

Yep 950 is ok, there is only 951 more in unstable which has some FF fixes.

Regards
damencho

···

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Bareiro <daniel-listas@gmx.net> wrote:

On 18/05/17 12:27, George Politis wrote:

Hi Daniel,

Hi, George

Thanks for your reply.

I believe that version is affected by the problem, so if you update the
problem should go away. I encourage you to update more frequently
since you’re in the unstable branch because we find and fix bugs and
issues pretty often there.

I hope this helps.

I'm now using the "testing" repository instead of "unstable". I see that
version 950-1 is available in "testing". Do you think it would be solved
in this version?

Thanks for your time.

Kind regards,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@jitsi.org
Unsubscribe instructions and other list options:
http://lists.jitsi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev


#7

Hi,

Hi, Damian.

Yep 950 is ok, there is only 951 more in unstable which has some FF fixes.

Perfect. Thanks for confirm.

Thanks for your reply.

Kind regards,
Daniel

···

On 18/05/17 12:57, Damian Minkov wrote: