На 27.01.11 17:28, Lee Sharp написа:
Simplicity is hence much more important than being able to guess what the project actually does.
The same goes for the name.
But a name is supposed to be something to help people easily remember a
person / place / concept. If it has no relevancy, it might as well be
some random characters on a keyboard.
You mean like ... skype?
And that does not work for people...
Well I don't know about that ...
Sorry, couldn't resist the joke :). The thing is that I'd really like to
avoid debating the new name. Consider it set in stone. There is
virtually no way everyone would like it, whatever it is and that was
clear during the off-list exchanges we've had on the matter.
Hence, the decision needed to be dictatorial and as such it is not
subject to discussion
Of course I still do not understand why the name is changing. And this
is after using Google and the website to try and find out...
Perhaps if someone can tell me the rational behind jitsi, and what it
means? Then I might be able to come up with a logo concept that could
be more relevant...
Check this out: http://goo.gl/Y2nlA
I am just looking for a way to increase mindshare, which is what I
believe to be our biggest issue right now.
This is a hard project to
find. I had been searching for months, and I am technically inclined.
I only found it via a private e-mail from a contributer on a different
Right now I am thinking a logo of a kind of visual
pun. A styalized version of one of these vehicles, on the ocean...
jit-sea... Yes, a tad tacky, but this is my first pass...
Okay, thanks! Keep this coming guys, feedback is much appreciated!
Also, please understand that I am not trying to pitch a fit and throw
stones. I am trying to clearly define a issue I believe the name has,
and propose solutions to the project. I just want to make sure I don't
come off as a ranting madman, complaining about everything.
Not at all Lee! I am grateful for your comments regardless of whether or
not I agree with all of them.